Editorial 3-2026: Between Protection and Impact – Where is Physical Security Heading?

April 12, 2026

XPONENTIAL Europe 2026 in Düsseldorf presented itself as a showcase for autonomy, resilience and connected security. Yet, despite all the technological fascination, a trend emerged that the industry can no longer ignore: physical security, civil infrastructure protection and military-relevant technologies are converging at a rapid pace.

Autonomous systems have long since become more than just tools – they are becoming integral components of complex operational architectures. Sensor technology, AI, data fusion and decision-making logic are merging into integrated systems whose technological foundations are virtually identical in both civilian and military contexts. Dual-use is thus no longer a side effect, but a structural principle.

This shift is also reflected in the European trade fair landscape. Events such as Eurosatory, DSEI and the ILA Berlin have traditionally stood alongside Enforce Tac, GPEC, Milipol Paris and Security Essen. This structure is complemented by specialised platforms such as AERO Drones, REAS and the new KRIFA.

With the Euro Defence Expo (EUDEX), a format is now emerging for the first time that systematically brings these previously separate worlds together – running parallel to Security Essen. This ‘total defence’ approach is strategically understandable, but at the same time marks a turning point: trade fairs are becoming geopolitical platforms where industrial, military and civil security logics intertwine. This is precisely where the critical dimension lies. The more physical security relies on military technologies, operational logic and industrial-scale deployment, the greater the risk of a creeping militarisation of civilian security architectures. The industry thus faces a fundamental question: where does protection end – and where does impact begin?

Key innovations in security technology

This makes innovations that clearly prioritise civilian benefits all the more important. With its new, mobile-phone-based and cloud-hosted access control system, Paxton presents a deliberately user-centred approach. The focus is on simple installation, flexible scaling and intuitive management – requirements devised based on the practical experience of installers and operators. The growing importance of mobile identities is consistently addressed without unnecessarily increasing system complexity.

Verkada pursues a similarly strong focus on integration, but with clear platform logic. The new hybrid cloud access control system combines centralised control, rapid implementation and seamless integration with video, alarm and visitor management systems. With features such as mobile NFC access credentials and the Access Station Pro, which combines access control, video and biometric procedures, one thing is clear: the future lies in convergent systems – albeit with a clear focus on operational efficiency and security management.

Both approaches demonstrate that progress in physical security does not necessarily have to be military in nature. They focus on user-centricity, integration and scalability – and thus provide important counterpoints to the increasingly military-inspired system logic of many large platforms.

The industry stands at a crossroads. The technological possibilities are impressive – but how they are deployed will be decisive. A line runs between resilience and armament, between protection and impact, which must be drawn more consciously in future. [Dr Claudia Mrozek]

Related Articles

TeleTrusT criticises draft CRA implementing legislation

Context: What the Cyber Resilience Act actually changes in the EU The Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) establishes, for the first time, a uniform EU-wide framework that sets out mandatory cybersecurity requirements for hardware and software (‘products with digital...

Share This