Comment on the blockage of a cement plant in Leimen: Protests against industry were foreseeable

April 8, 2025

We are committed to both the right to property and the right to freedom of expression and demonstration – essential pillars of our democracy. At the same time, the state’s monopoly on the use of force as a guarantor of security and order must be brought to the forefront of the discussion. The police have the task of ensuring the protection of property and means of production and of taking a firm stand against extremist behavior.

The action in Leimen, where radical activists blocked a cement plant for eight hours, shows that swift and consistent action is essential in such incidents. Owners and business stakeholders have a legitimate interest in threats against their production sites being immediately averted and these places quickly cleared. A passive approach on the part of the police cannot be justified – as the guarantor of law and order, the police must intervene to clearly separate the democratically legitimized freedom of demonstration from radical actions and attacks on corporate property.

See also the report from April 9, 2025: https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article255889704/Leimen-Zementwerk-fuer-8-Stunden-blockiert-Radikale-Aktivisten-kleben-sich-fest.html?wtrid=socialmedia.socialflow….socialflow_twitter

Related Articles

When proximity to politics becomes a risk buffer

Why unequal penalties for business-linked companies undermine the foundations of markets governed by the rule of law The study by the University of Waterloo and Nanjing University touches on a sensitive issue in modern market economies: the link between political...

The GDPR in the AI era: When measures no longer fit the reality

Author: Marc ten Eikelder, Head of EMEA Marketing and Senior Director of Industry Research at Kiteworks The General Data Protection Regulation is celebrating its 10th anniversary. It came into force on 25 May 2016 and became binding two years later. From a German...

Share This